Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for December 26, 2019

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for December 26, 2019

State v. Inzunza

  • Does a 26-month delay between the filing of charges and a person’s arrest violate that person’s Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial.

High Desert State Prison v. Sanchez

  • Does attempted lewdness with a child under 14 constitute a continuing offense.
  • How should a district court determine an award of good time credits when the charged offense is continuous in nature.

White v. State, Div. of Forestry

  • Is a person who suffers an industrial injury while incarcerated, but who subsequently is released and seeks workers’ compensation disability benefits due to that injury, entitled to have the benefits calculated at the minimum wage guaranteed under the Nevada Constitution.

Chandra v. Schulte

  • When does the spousal exception to the Nevada Real Estate Education, Research and Recovery Fund apply to permit a spouse to recover from the fund.

CABRERA (IVONNE) VS. STATE

  • Can duress be asserted to a crime that is not punishable by death, but requires proof of intent to commit a crime that is punishable by death.

BENKO VS. QUALITY LOAN SERV. CORP.

  • Do trustees who exercise the power of sale under a deed of trust pursuant to NRS Chapter 107 engage in collection activities under Chapter 649 such that they must be licensed under that chapter.

IN RE: APPLICATION OF FINLEY

  • Can a district court consider previously sealed criminal convictions when determining whether to grant a petition to seal other criminal records.

Visit the Nevada Appellate Report for more legal news.

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for May 2, 2019

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for May 2, 2019

CITY OF RENO VS. YTURBIDE

  • Can a workers’ compensation insurer reduce the 25-percent lump-sum-payment limit for an employee’s PPD award when that employee has already received a lump-sum payment for a previous PPD award.

SIERRA PACIFIC INDUS. VS. WILSON, P.E.

  • Does Nevada’s policy mandating beneficial use of water require application of the anti-speculation doctrine to requests for extensions of time such that a permittee who is not planning to use the water must show evidence of its formal relationship with a third party who will be using the water in its place.

STATE, DEP’T OF CORR. VS. LUDWICK

  • Must an administrative hearing officer defer to an agency’s decision when determining whether a violation is so serious that it warrants termination for a first-time offense.

TRICARICHI VS. COÖPERATIEVE RABOBANK, U.A.

  • Does Nevada’s long-arm statute encompass a conspiracy theory of personal jurisdiction.

Visit the Nevada Appellate Report for more legal news.