Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for February 27, 2020

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for February 27, 2020

Chur v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct.

  • Can a corporate director or officer be held individually liable for breaching his or her fiduciary duty of care through gross negligence.

7510 Perla Del Mar Ave Tr. v. Bank of Am.

  • Does an offer to pay a superpriority amount in the future, once that amount is determined, constitute a tender sufficient to preserve a first deed of trust.

Coroner v. Las Vegas Review-Journal

  • Can the Coroner’s Office refuse to disclose a juvenile autopsy report once it has provided the report to a Child Death Review team under NRS 432B.407(6).
  • Does NRS 239.012 immunize a governmental entity from an award of attorney fees when the entity, in response to a records request, withholds public records in good faith.

Stark v. Lackey

  • Were comments posted to a public Facebook page criticizing a Nevada Department of Wildlife’s biologist’s handling of bears related to a matter of public interest such that they constituted good-faith communications entitled to anti-SLAPP protections.

Visit the Nevada Appellate Report for more legal news.

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for February 20, 2020

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for February 20, 2020

Republican Att’ys Gen. Ass’n v. LVMPD

  • Is bodycam footage subject to the confidentiality provisions listed in the Nevada Public Records Act (NPRA).
  • Did the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (LVMPD) waive its assertion of confidentiality under NRS 239.0107 or NRS 239.011 when it failed to timely respond to a request for bodycam footage and other related records.
  • Does NRS 62H.025 require a juvenile to be brought before the juvenile court for information to be considered confidential juvenile justice information.

Visit the Nevada Appellate Report for more legal news.

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for January 30, 2020

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for January 30, 2020

Paulos v. FCH1, LLC

  • What is the preclusive effect of a qualified-immunity decision where the federal district court’s judgment addressed both prongs of the qualified-immunity inquiry, but the federal appellate court addressed only one prong to affirm the judgment.

Flowers v. State

  • Was evidence of a subsequent murder properly admitted in a murder prosecution under the identity exception to NRS 48.045(2).

Visit the Nevada Appellate Report for more legal news.