Month: December 2018

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for December 27, 2018

Posted on by Jeff Jaeger

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for December 27, 2018

GONOR VS. DALE

  • Does a deceased party’s actual date of death, or the suggestion of death filed on the record, trigger the 90-day time limitation prescribed in NRCP 25(a)(1) under which a motion to substitute the proper party in place of the deceased party must be filed in order to preclude dismissal.

CAPANNA, M.D. VS. ORTH C/W 70227

  • What constitutes improper jury nullification and golden rule arguments during closing argument.

HARRIS (AMMAR) VS. STATE (DEATH PENALTY-DIRECT)

  • When can gruesome photographs of a victim’s injuries be properly admitted in a criminal case.

BRANCH BANKING & TR. CO. VS. GERRARD, ESQ.

  • When does a litigation malpractice claim accrue.

IN RE: ESTATE OF SARGE

  • Is an order finally resolving a constituent consolidated case immediately appealable as a final judgment even where the other constituent case or cases remain pending.

COOPER (JAMES) VS. STATE

  • What evidence satisfies the prima facie showing of race-based discrimination to determine whether a peremptory challenge is improperly based on race.

Visit the Nevada Appellate Report for more legal news.

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for December 20, 2018

Posted on by Jeff Jaeger

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for December 20, 2018

NATKO (HELEN) VS. STATE

  • Does a person’s status as a joint account holder by itself provide lawful authority to use or transfer another’s assets for their own benefit.

STATE VS. BROWN (TAREN)

  • What constitutes a “good cause showing” that the State must make under NRS 177.015 in order to file an interlocutory appeal from a district court order denying a motion to suppress evidence.

Visit the Nevada Appellate Report for more legal news.

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for December 13, 2018

Posted on by Jeff Jaeger

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for December 13, 2018

FLORES VS. LAS VEGAS-CLARK CTY. LIBRARY DIST.

  • Does Senate Bill 175, which declares that the regulation of firearms in Nevada is within the exclusive domain of the Legislature, and any other law, regulation, rule or ordinance to the contrary is null and void, preempt a library district from banning the possession of firearms on its premises.

CENTURY SURETY CO. VS. ANDREW (NRAP 5)

  • Is the liability of an insurer that has breached its duty to defend, but has not acted in bad faith, capped at the policy limit plus any costs incurred by the insured in mounting a defense, or is the insurer liable for all losses consequential to the insurer’s breach.

BRANHAM (WILLIAM) VS. WARDEN

  • Do the United States Supreme Court decisions in Welch v. United States, 578 U.S. ___, 136 S. Ct. 1257 (2016), and Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S ___, 36 S. Ct. 718 (2016), constitute good cause to overcome the procedural bars to a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which the petitioner contends he is entitled to the retroactive application of a nonconstitutional substantive rule.

DOOLIN (GLENN) VS. STATE, DEPT. OF CORR.

  • Can an offender have statutory credit earned pursuant to NRS 209.4465 applied to the offender’s parole eligibility and minimum term of sentence imposed pursuant to NRS 207.010.

IN RE: EXECUTION SEARCH WARRANTS

  • Does NRS 18.010, which permits an award of attorney fees to a prevailing party in a civil action, permit a fee award against a police department ordered to return a large amount of cash and other property seized pursuant to a criminal search warrant.

Visit the Nevada Appellate Report for more legal news.

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for December 6, 2018

Posted on by Jeff Jaeger

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for December 6, 2018

STATE VS. DIST. CT. (HEARN (MATTHEW))

  • Is the prosecutorial veto within NRS 176A.290, which authorizes a district court to assign certain eligible defendants to a veterans court program, unconstitutional.

RODRIGUEZ (JUAN) VS. STATE

  • Is NRS 200.481(2)(b) an enhancement statute such that battery causing substantial bodily harm cannot be enhanced for committing a crime against a person 60 years of age or older under NRS 193.167.

STATE VS. DIST. CT. (OJEDA (FRANCISCO))

  • Does a district court have authority to order the State to disclose veniremember criminal history information it acquires from a government database that is unavailable to the defense.

LAKE TAHOE PROTECTION DIST. VS. BD. OF ADMIN.

  • Does NRS 616B.578 require an employer to prove that it had knowledge of a specific diagnosis of an employee’s preexisting condition to qualify for reimbursement on a worker’s compensation claim.

O’KEEFE VS. STATE, DEP’T OF MOTOR VEHICLES

  • What is the correct standard of review that a hearing officer must apply to a Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) disciplinary decision to terminate an employee.

Visit the Nevada Appellate Report for more legal news.