Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for January 3, 2019
- What is the appropriate standard of review for a district court’s denial or grant of an anti-SLAPP motion to dismiss.
- What conduct is a protected communication under Nevada’s anti-SLAPP statute.
- Does NRS 485.045 permit a district court to admit evidence of a separate sexual offense for purposes of proving propensity in a sexual offense prosecution.
- Must a court hold a Petrocelli hearing in cases where the State seeks to present evidence of separate acts constituting sexual offenses for purposes of showing propensity in a current sexual offense prosecution.