Tag: NRS 207

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for December 13, 2018

Posted on by Jeff Jaeger

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for December 13, 2018

FLORES VS. LAS VEGAS-CLARK CTY. LIBRARY DIST.

  • Does Senate Bill 175, which declares that the regulation of firearms in Nevada is within the exclusive domain of the Legislature, and any other law, regulation, rule or ordinance to the contrary is null and void, preempt a library district from banning the possession of firearms on its premises.

CENTURY SURETY CO. VS. ANDREW (NRAP 5)

  • Is the liability of an insurer that has breached its duty to defend, but has not acted in bad faith, capped at the policy limit plus any costs incurred by the insured in mounting a defense, or is the insurer liable for all losses consequential to the insurer’s breach.

BRANHAM (WILLIAM) VS. WARDEN

  • Do the United States Supreme Court decisions in Welch v. United States, 578 U.S. ___, 136 S. Ct. 1257 (2016), and Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S ___, 36 S. Ct. 718 (2016), constitute good cause to overcome the procedural bars to a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which the petitioner contends he is entitled to the retroactive application of a nonconstitutional substantive rule.

DOOLIN (GLENN) VS. STATE, DEPT. OF CORR.

  • Can an offender have statutory credit earned pursuant to NRS 209.4465 applied to the offender’s parole eligibility and minimum term of sentence imposed pursuant to NRS 207.010.

IN RE: EXECUTION SEARCH WARRANTS

  • Does NRS 18.010, which permits an award of attorney fees to a prevailing party in a civil action, permit a fee award against a police department ordered to return a large amount of cash and other property seized pursuant to a criminal search warrant.

Visit the Nevada Appellate Report for more legal news.

Does a party’s failure to sign an arbitration agreement make it unenforceable?

Posted on by Jeff Jaeger

Mike v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct. (Nev. Supreme Ct. – Sep. 24, 2015)

Petitioners Mika, Harter, and Tallman sought writs of mandamus directing the district court to vacate its orders compelling arbitration of their claims against their former employer, CPS Security (USA), Inc., and certain of its agents and associates (collectively, CPS). All three petitioners signed the same long- form arbitration agreement, which included a clause waiving the right to initiate or participate in class actions. They urged the Supreme Court of Nevada to invalidate the agreement because, among other issues, it was not countersigned by CPS.

The issue is whether CPS’s failure to sign the long-form agreement made it unenforceable and that the short-form agreement, which CPS did sign and which did not include a class action waiver clause, therefore controlled.

CPS provided security services to construction companies in Nevada and elsewhere. Petitioners worked 50 to 70 hours per week for CPS as trailer guards. As a condition of their employment, CPS required petitioners to sleep overnight in small trailers located at its work sites. CPS did not pay petitioners for their sleep time except when they were called out to respond to an alarm or other activity at the site. Petitioners alleged, and CPS denied, that they are owed at least the minimum wage for the required on-site sleep time, whether called out during the night or not, as well as overtime pay.

Continue reading “Does a party’s failure to sign an arbitration agreement make it unenforceable?” →