Tag: NRS 18.010

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for October 1, 2020

Posted on by Jeff Jaeger

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for October 1, 2020

COTTER, JR. VS. KANE

  • Can a corporate nominal defendant in a derivative action challenge or defend the underlying merits of that action.
  • What must a court consider when determining whether a shareholder plaintiff adequately represents shareholders and thus has standing to bring a derivative action.

 TURNER (STEVEN) VS. STATE 

  • Does a defendant waive or forfeit a Bruton argument where the defendant moves to sever the trial on Bruton grounds but thereafter cooperates to redact the statements and neither objects to the statements at trial nor renews the Bruton argument before the admission of the statements to the jury.

 HARVEY (ALFRED) VS. STATE

  • Does NRS 175.101 preclude a judge other than the trial judge from deciding post-trial motions where there is no evidence that the trial judge is absent, deceased, sick, or disabled.

GONZALES (MELVIN) VS. STATE

  • What types of ineffective-assistance claims are permitted by NRS 34.810(1)(a).

Visit the Nevada Appellate Report for more legal news.

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for April 2, 2020

Posted on by Jeff Jaeger

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for April 2, 2020

Cummings v. Barber

  • Does Nevada NRS 41A.100, Nevada’s res ipsa loquitur statute, apply where a surgeon fails to remove a foreign object that was implanted and left inside a patient’s body during a previous surgery.

Jaramillo v. Ramos

  • Must a plaintiff relying on NRS 41A.100, Nevada’s res ipsa loquitur statute’s presumption for a prima facie case of negligence in a medical malpractice action, provide expert testimony to survive a defendant’s summary judgment motion.

Jones v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n

  • Pursuant to NRS 104.3309, how must an enforcing party show that it had the right to enforce a note when it lost possession or acquired ownership of the note from a party that had the right to enforce it.

LVMPD v. Ctr. for Investigative Reporting

  • Does a requesting party, who requests nonconfidential public records from a governmental entity, prevail for the purposes of awarding attorney fees and costs when the parties reach an agreement that affords the requesting party access to the requested records before the court enters judgment on the merits.

145 E. Harmon II Tr. v. Res. at MGM Grand

  • Does a voluntary dismissal with prejudice convey prevailing party status on a defendant to allow the recovery of attorney fees and costs pursuant to NRS 18.010 and NRS 18.020.

In re Colman Family Revocable Living Tr.

  • Does NRS 111.781, which governs the effects of divorce on nonprobate transfers of property, revoke a spouse’s interest in property.

Visit the Nevada Appellate Report for more legal news.

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for September 26, 2019

Posted on by Jeff Jaeger

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for September 26, 2019

Patush v. Las Vegas Bistro

  • What is the applicable limitations period for wrongful termination claims.

SFR Invs. Pool 1 v. U.S. Bank

  • May a court consider a bankruptcy stay in determining whether there was unfairness in a foreclosure sale.

State, Dep’t of Bus. & Indus. v. TitleMax

  • Does NRS 604A.445(3) permit an extension of a 210-day title loan through a grace period that recalculates the payments during the original term of the loan.

Visit the Nevada Appellate Report for more legal news.

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for December 27, 2018

Posted on by Jeff Jaeger

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for December 27, 2018

GONOR VS. DALE

  • Does a deceased party’s actual date of death, or the suggestion of death filed on the record, trigger the 90-day time limitation prescribed in NRCP 25(a)(1) under which a motion to substitute the proper party in place of the deceased party must be filed in order to preclude dismissal.

CAPANNA, M.D. VS. ORTH C/W 70227

  • What constitutes improper jury nullification and golden rule arguments during closing argument.

HARRIS (AMMAR) VS. STATE (DEATH PENALTY-DIRECT)

  • When can gruesome photographs of a victim’s injuries be properly admitted in a criminal case.

BRANCH BANKING & TR. CO. VS. GERRARD, ESQ.

  • When does a litigation malpractice claim accrue.

IN RE: ESTATE OF SARGE

  • Is an order finally resolving a constituent consolidated case immediately appealable as a final judgment even where the other constituent case or cases remain pending.

COOPER (JAMES) VS. STATE

  • What evidence satisfies the prima facie showing of race-based discrimination to determine whether a peremptory challenge is improperly based on race.

Visit the Nevada Appellate Report for more legal news.

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for December 13, 2018

Posted on by Jeff Jaeger

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for December 13, 2018

FLORES VS. LAS VEGAS-CLARK CTY. LIBRARY DIST.

  • Does Senate Bill 175, which declares that the regulation of firearms in Nevada is within the exclusive domain of the Legislature, and any other law, regulation, rule or ordinance to the contrary is null and void, preempt a library district from banning the possession of firearms on its premises.

CENTURY SURETY CO. VS. ANDREW (NRAP 5)

  • Is the liability of an insurer that has breached its duty to defend, but has not acted in bad faith, capped at the policy limit plus any costs incurred by the insured in mounting a defense, or is the insurer liable for all losses consequential to the insurer’s breach.

BRANHAM (WILLIAM) VS. WARDEN

  • Do the United States Supreme Court decisions in Welch v. United States, 578 U.S. ___, 136 S. Ct. 1257 (2016), and Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S ___, 36 S. Ct. 718 (2016), constitute good cause to overcome the procedural bars to a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which the petitioner contends he is entitled to the retroactive application of a nonconstitutional substantive rule.

DOOLIN (GLENN) VS. STATE, DEPT. OF CORR.

  • Can an offender have statutory credit earned pursuant to NRS 209.4465 applied to the offender’s parole eligibility and minimum term of sentence imposed pursuant to NRS 207.010.

IN RE: EXECUTION SEARCH WARRANTS

  • Does NRS 18.010, which permits an award of attorney fees to a prevailing party in a civil action, permit a fee award against a police department ordered to return a large amount of cash and other property seized pursuant to a criminal search warrant.

Visit the Nevada Appellate Report for more legal news.

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for September 13, 2018

Posted on by Jeff Jaeger

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for September 13, 2018

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. VS. RADECKI

  • Is a regularly conducted, non-collusive NRS Chapter 116 foreclosure sale exempt from the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA) pursuant to NRS 112.170(2).
  • Does an alleged inaccuracy in a foreclosure deed invalidate an otherwise valid foreclosure sale.

IN RE: CONNELL LIVING TRUST

  • Does a trust beneficiary forfeit interest in the trust’s assets pursuant to a no-contest clause penalty by breaching her fiduciary duties while acting in her dual capacity as trustee.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. VS. SFR INV.’S POOL 1, LLC

  • Does a first deed of trust holder’s unconditional tender of a superpriority amount due result in the buyer at foreclosure taking the property subject to the deed of trust.

BAIGUEN VS. HARRAH’S LAS VEGAS, LLC

  • When does an injury arising from an employer’s failure to provide medical assistance to an employee arise out of and in the course of the employment.

IBARRA (GABRIEL) VS. STATE

  • Does a person who asks to borrow another person’s property temporarily while intending to steal it permanently, take the property without the other person’s consent for purposes of NRS 205.270(1) (larceny from a person).

ROSENBERG LIVING TRUST VS. MACDONALD HIGHLANDS REALTY, LLC C/W 70478

  • Does Nevada recognize implied restrictive covenants based on a common development scheme.

Visit the Nevada Appellate Report for more legal news.

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for August 30, 2018

Posted on by Jeff Jaeger

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for August 30, 2018

O’CONNELL V. WYNN LAS VEGAS, LLC

  • Must a lawyer, who represents a client on a contingency fee basis, provide proof of hourly billing records before he or she can be awarded attorney fees that are otherwise allowed by agreement, rule, or statute.

LASTINE V. STATE

MOONEY V. STATE

  • When does a private individual act as an agent or instrument for the government implicating the protections of the Fourth Amendment from an unreasonable search and seizure.

Visit the Nevada Appellate Report for more legal news.

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for August 2, 2018

Posted on by Jeff Jaeger

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for August 2, 2018

COLES (BRENT) VS. BISBEE

  • Does the Parole Board’s use of the Static-99R recidivism risk assessment comply with the relevant statutory provisions governing parole review for prisoners convicted of sexual offenses.

SHORES VS. GLOBAL EXPERIENCE SPECIALISTS, INC.

  • Must a noncompete agreement that imposes a nationwide restriction be limited to the geographical areas in which an employer has particular business interests.

N. NEVADA HOMES, LLC VS. GL CONSTR., INC.

  • What is the proper method of determining the prevailing party when faced with both a settlement and a damages recovery.

IN RE: PARENTAL RIGHTS AS TO S.L., N.R.B., H.R.B., W.C.B. C/W 71889

  • Does the termination of parental rights bases on the parents’ refusal to admit to abuse violate their Fifth Amendment rights.

SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC VS. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (NRAP 5)

  • Does NRS 116.31168(1)’s incorporation of NRS 107.090 require a homeowner’s association to provide notices of default and/or sale to persons or entities holding a subordinate interest even when such persons or entities did not request notice, prior to the amendment that took effect on October 1, 2015.

GRANADA-RUIZ (GAMBINO) VS. DIST. CT. (STATE)

  • When does double jeopardy prohibit a retrial.

CLARK CTY. VS. HQ METRO, LLC

  • Does an order for immediate occupancy permitting a party to occupy a permanent easement vest a right to compensation.

NEVADA RECYCLING AND SALVAGE, LTD VS. RENO DISPOSAL CO., INC.

  • Were the appellants injured in their business and therefore have standing to assert their claim under the Nevada Unfair Trade Practice Act (UTPA).

HUBBARD (CORY) VS. STATE

  • Must the defense place intent or absence of mistake at issue before the State can seek admission of prior act evidence.

RIPPO (MICHAEL) VS. STATE (DEATH PENALTY-PC)

Visit the Nevada Appellate Report for more legal news.

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for May 3, 2018

Posted on by Jeff Jaeger

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for May 3, 2018

DOLORES VS. STATE, DEP’T OF EMPLOYMENT SEC. DIV.

  • Is submitting a resignation when faced with a resign-or-be-fired option a voluntary resignation under NRS 612.380, thereby disqualifying an individual from unemployment benefits.

LAS VEGAS DEV. GRP., LLC VS. BLAHA

  • Do the time limitations in NRS 107.080(5)-(6) (2010) bar an action challenging an NRS Chapter 107 nonjudicial foreclosure where it is alleged that the deed of trust had been extinguished before the sale.

COTTER, JR. VS. DIST. CT. (COTTER)

  • Do documents disclosed to third parties constitute waiver of the work-product privilege.

MEI-GSR HOLDINGS, LLC VS. PEPPERMILL CASINOS, INC.

  • Does NRS 600A.030, Nevada’s Uniform Trade Secrets Act (NTSA), preclude a defendant from demonstrating that certain information is readily ascertainable and not a trade secret even though the defendant acquired the information through improper means.

FITZGERALD VS. MOBILE BILLBOARDS, LLC

  • Were allegedly defamatory statements made by an employer regarding an employee’s alleged abuse of the workers’ compensation program to obtain prescription pain medication, a violation of NRS 616D.300, absolutely privileged.

IN RE: MATTER OF E.R. C/W 73198

  • Does a familial placement preference survive the termination of parental rights.

COLEMAN (SOLOMON) VS. STATE

  • Does NRS 200.604 prohibit a person from copying, without permission, a consensually recorded video depicting sexual acts.

MORGAN (JOHN) VS. STATE

Visit the Nevada Appellate Report for more legal news.

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for April 12, 2018

Posted on by Jeff Jaeger

Nevada Appellate Courts Advance Opinions for April 12, 2018

CAIN VS. PRICE C/W 69889/70864

  • Does one party’s material breach of a contract release the non-breaching party’s contractual obligation to a third-party beneficiary.

U.S. HOME CORP. VS. THE MICHAEL BALLESTEROS TRUST

  • Does the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) govern the arbitration agreement contained in a common-interest community’s Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs).

CLARK CTY. OFFICE OF THE CORONER/MED. EXAM’R VS. LAS VEGAS REVIEW JOURNAL

  • Is a local government entity that moved for a stay under NRCP 62, entitled to a stay of a money judgment without bond or other security.

Visit the Nevada Appellate Report for more legal news.