{"id":47,"date":"2015-02-27T07:16:03","date_gmt":"2015-02-27T15:16:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/?p=47"},"modified":"2018-12-15T10:03:30","modified_gmt":"2018-12-15T18:03:30","slug":"martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/","title":{"rendered":"What happens when an attorney fails to object to a constitutional error at trial?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Martinorellan v. State (Nev. Supreme Ct. \u2013 Feb. 26, 2015)<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 2\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p>In this case, the Nevada Supreme Court considered the district court&#8217;s failure to instruct a jury to restart deliberations as is required by NRS 175.061(4) after an alternate juror replaced a regular juror.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMartinorellan entered a smoke shop and stabbed the store&#8217;s owner while attempting to commit a robbery. At trial, the jury deliberated for approximately 1 hour and 15 minutes before the district court convened a hearing, dismissed a juror who stated that he knew the victim, and replaced that juror with an alternate juror. The district court did not recall the jury to the courtroom or instruct it to restart deliberations. Martinorellan did not object to the district court&#8217;s decision not to recall the jury and instruct it to restart deliberations. The reconstituted jury deliberated for nearly 4 hours and 30 minutes over two days and viewed a playback of testimony before convicting Martinorellan of burglary while in possession of a deadly weapon, attempted robbery with the use of a deadly weapon, and battery with the use of a deadly weapon.\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 4\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p>On appeal, Martinorellan argued that the failure to instruct the jury to restart deliberations after an alternate juror replaced an original juror was an error of constitutional dimension because it interfered with his constitutional right to a trial by a fair and impartial jury. The State argued that this error was not of constitutional dimension because the district court did not prevent the jury from restarting deliberations after the alternate juror was seated.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>The Nevada Supreme Court reasoned that the failure to instruct a jury to restart deliberations after an alternate juror replaces an original juror during deliberations can create the risk of the original jurors exerting undue influence on the alternate juror<i>. <\/i>Since this infringes on a defendant&#8217;s right to a trial by an impartial jury, the <a href=\"http:\/\/caseinfo.nvsupremecourt.us\/document\/view.do?csNameID=27055&amp;csIID=27055&amp;deLinkID=499905&amp;sireDocumentNumber=15-06128\">Court held<\/a>\u00a0that the district court&#8217;s failure to instruct the jury to restart deliberations was an error of constitutional dimension.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">What standard of review for unpreserved constitutional errors?<\/span><\/p>\n<p>At trial, Martinorellan did not object to the district court\u2019s decision not to recall the jury.\u00a0 However, he argued that the standard of review for an unpreserved constitutional error should be the same as that for a preserved constitutional error.\u00a0Citing <em>Johnson v. United States<\/em>, 520 U.S. 461, 465-66 (1997), the <a href=\"http:\/\/caseinfo.nvsupremecourt.us\/document\/view.do?csNameID=27055&amp;csIID=27055&amp;deLinkID=499905&amp;sireDocumentNumber=15-06128\">Court held <\/a>that all unpreserved errors are to be reviewed for plain error without regard as to whether they are of constitutional dimension.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Plain Error?<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The Court also held that because the relative lengths of time that the jury deliberated before and after the alternate juror replaced an original juror do not demonstrate that the district court&#8217;s error was prejudicial, Martinorellan failed to demonstrate that the district court&#8217;s failure to instruct the reconstituted jury to restart deliberations rose to the level of plain error.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Justice Saitta and Justice Cherry dissent<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Although the dissenting justices agreed with the majority&#8217;s conclusion that a district court&#8217;s failure to instruct the jury to restart deliberations impairs a defendant&#8217;s constitutional right to a trial by an impartial jury, they believe that this failure is a structural error which requires that Martinorellan&#8217;s conviction be reversed and his case be remanded for a new trial.<\/p>\n<p>The dissenting justices also noted that the district court&#8217;s failure to instruct the jury to begin deliberating anew impliedly allows the jury to rely on the deliberations of the removed juror\u2014a person who is not part of the jury actually deciding the defendant&#8217;s guilt, which undermines the defendant&#8217;s right to an impartial jury.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Martinorellan v. State (Nev. Supreme Ct. \u2013 Feb. 26, 2015) In this case, the Nevada Supreme Court considered the district court&#8217;s failure to instruct a jury to restart deliberations as is required by NRS 175.061(4) after an alternate juror replaced a regular juror. \u201cMartinorellan entered a smoke shop and stabbed the store&#8217;s owner while attempting [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":3024,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[19,20,22],"class_list":["post-47","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-jury","tag-constitutional-error","tag-juror","tag-jury"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>What happens when an attorney fails to object to a constitutional error at trial? - Nevada Appellate Report<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Supreme Court of Nevada considered a court&#039;s failure to instruct a jury to restart deliberations after an alternate juror replaced a regular juror.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"What happens when an attorney fails to object to a constitutional error at trial? - Nevada Appellate Report\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Supreme Court of Nevada considered a court&#039;s failure to instruct a jury to restart deliberations after an alternate juror replaced a regular juror.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Nevada Appellate Report\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jeffjaegerlaw\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jeffjaegerlaw\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-02-27T15:16:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-15T18:03:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/02\/JurorsSelection-e1434297785224.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"111\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jeff Jaeger\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@jeffjaegerlaw\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@jeffjaegerlaw\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jeff Jaeger\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Jeff Jaeger\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#\/schema\/person\/aaf883142d6b4d6c37b928912f475055\"},\"headline\":\"What happens when an attorney fails to object to a constitutional error at trial?\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-02-27T15:16:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-15T18:03:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/\"},\"wordCount\":597,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/02\/JurorsSelection-e1434297785224.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Constitutional Error\",\"juror\",\"Jury\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Jury\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/\",\"name\":\"What happens when an attorney fails to object to a constitutional error at trial? - Nevada Appellate Report\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/02\/JurorsSelection-e1434297785224.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-02-27T15:16:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-15T18:03:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#\/schema\/person\/aaf883142d6b4d6c37b928912f475055\"},\"description\":\"The Supreme Court of Nevada considered a court's failure to instruct a jury to restart deliberations after an alternate juror replaced a regular juror.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/02\/JurorsSelection-e1434297785224.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/02\/JurorsSelection-e1434297785224.jpg\",\"width\":200,\"height\":111},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"What happens when an attorney fails to object to a constitutional error at trial?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/\",\"name\":\"Nevada Appellate Report\",\"description\":\"Thoughts and commentary on recent Nevada appellate cases\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#\/schema\/person\/aaf883142d6b4d6c37b928912f475055\",\"name\":\"Jeff Jaeger\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a80c0f8748487218bdd8766770c52aea629e674e3e037731d61e0b14f2283567?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a80c0f8748487218bdd8766770c52aea629e674e3e037731d61e0b14f2283567?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jeff Jaeger\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jeffjaegerlaw\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/jeffjaegerlaw\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/author\/jeff-jaeger\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"What happens when an attorney fails to object to a constitutional error at trial? - Nevada Appellate Report","description":"The Supreme Court of Nevada considered a court's failure to instruct a jury to restart deliberations after an alternate juror replaced a regular juror.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"What happens when an attorney fails to object to a constitutional error at trial? - Nevada Appellate Report","og_description":"The Supreme Court of Nevada considered a court's failure to instruct a jury to restart deliberations after an alternate juror replaced a regular juror.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/","og_site_name":"Nevada Appellate Report","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jeffjaegerlaw","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jeffjaegerlaw","article_published_time":"2015-02-27T15:16:03+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-15T18:03:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":200,"height":111,"url":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/02\/JurorsSelection-e1434297785224.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Jeff Jaeger","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@jeffjaegerlaw","twitter_site":"@jeffjaegerlaw","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jeff Jaeger","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/"},"author":{"name":"Jeff Jaeger","@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#\/schema\/person\/aaf883142d6b4d6c37b928912f475055"},"headline":"What happens when an attorney fails to object to a constitutional error at trial?","datePublished":"2015-02-27T15:16:03+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-15T18:03:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/"},"wordCount":597,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/02\/JurorsSelection-e1434297785224.jpg","keywords":["Constitutional Error","juror","Jury"],"articleSection":["Jury"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/","url":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/","name":"What happens when an attorney fails to object to a constitutional error at trial? - Nevada Appellate Report","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/02\/JurorsSelection-e1434297785224.jpg","datePublished":"2015-02-27T15:16:03+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-15T18:03:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#\/schema\/person\/aaf883142d6b4d6c37b928912f475055"},"description":"The Supreme Court of Nevada considered a court's failure to instruct a jury to restart deliberations after an alternate juror replaced a regular juror.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/02\/JurorsSelection-e1434297785224.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/02\/JurorsSelection-e1434297785224.jpg","width":200,"height":111},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/02\/27\/martinorellan-v-state-nev-supreme-ct-feb-26-2015\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"What happens when an attorney fails to object to a constitutional error at trial?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/","name":"Nevada Appellate Report","description":"Thoughts and commentary on recent Nevada appellate cases","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#\/schema\/person\/aaf883142d6b4d6c37b928912f475055","name":"Jeff Jaeger","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a80c0f8748487218bdd8766770c52aea629e674e3e037731d61e0b14f2283567?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a80c0f8748487218bdd8766770c52aea629e674e3e037731d61e0b14f2283567?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Jeff Jaeger"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jeffjaegerlaw","https:\/\/x.com\/jeffjaegerlaw"],"url":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/author\/jeff-jaeger\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3025,"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47\/revisions\/3025"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3024"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=47"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=47"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}