{"id":3497,"date":"2017-09-16T08:28:45","date_gmt":"2017-09-16T15:28:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/?p=3497"},"modified":"2018-12-15T10:03:22","modified_gmt":"2018-12-15T18:03:22","slug":"does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/","title":{"rendered":"Does Nevada law prohibit an out of state party from secretly recording their telephone conversation with someone in Nevada?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Recording<\/a><\/p>\n

Ditech Financial, LLC vs. Buckles (Nev. Supreme Ct. \u2013 Sep. 14, 2017)<\/strong><\/p>\n

NRS 200.620<\/a> prohibits a person from recording a telephone call unless both parties participating in the call consent to the recording. In response to a certified question submitted by the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, the Supreme Court of Nevada considered whether NRS 200.620 applies to telephone recordings made by a party outside Nevada who uses equipment outside Nevada to record telephone conversations with a person in Nevada without that person’s consent.<\/p>\n

The original proceeding arose out of a class action suit brought by Sanford Buckles against Ditech Financial LLC in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. Ditech, a Delaware limited liability company, is a home mortgage servicer that was headquartered in Minnesota at the time Buckles initiated the underlying litigation. Although Ditech is now headquartered in Florida, it has customer call centers equipped to record telephone calls in Arizona and Minnesota. Buckles is a Nevada resident whose home mortgage is serviced by Ditech. In his complaint, Buckles alleged Ditech violated NRS 200.620 by unlawfully recording certain telephone conversations without Buckles’s consent.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Ditech moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing NRS 200.620 does not apply to telephone calls recorded by persons and on equipment located outside of Nevada, and if NRS 200.620 does apply, the extraterritorial application of NRS 200.620 would violate the United States Constitution\u2019s Due Process Clause and Dormant Commerce Clause. The federal court concluded:<\/p>\n

If [NRS] 200.620 does not apply to recordings made outside of Nevada by Ditech, Ditech\u2019s motion to dismiss is due to be granted. If the statute applies to telephone recordings made outside of Nevada by Ditech, however, this Court must decide Ditech\u2019s constitutional challenge to the statute under the Due Process Clause and the Dormant Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. The necessity of reaching these serious constitutional questions depends upon resolution of prior, potentially dispositive, questions of Nevada statutory law.<\/p>\n

The federal court therefore decided to certify a question under NRAP 5<\/a> concerning the applicability of NRS 200.620. Because the parties ultimately were unable to agree upon the appropriate language of the question to be certified, the federal court certified two questions to the Court:<\/p>\n

Plaintiff\u2019s position:<\/strong> Does [NRS] 200.620 apply to telephone recordings made by a party outside Nevada, who regularly records telephone conversations with Nevada residents, of telephone conversations with a person in Nevada without that person\u2019s consent?<\/p>\n

Defendant\u2019s position:<\/strong> Does [NRS] 200.620 apply to telephone recordings by a party outside Nevada who uses equipment outside Nevada to record telephone conversations with a person in Nevada without that person\u2019s consent? If so, does that decision apply retroactively or prospectively only?<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court of Nevada noted<\/a> that the two certified questions ask essentially the same thing: whether NRS 200.620 applies to recordings of telephone conversations with a person in Nevada without that person\u2019s consent when the recordings are made by a party who is located and uses recording equipment outside of Nevada.<\/p>\n

In relevant part, NRS 200.620(1)(a)<\/a> provides that \u201cit is unlawful for any person to intercept or attempt to intercept any wire communication unless . . [t]he interception or attempted interception is made with the prior consent of one of the parties to the communication.\u201d See also<\/em> NRS 179.430<\/a> (defining \u201c[i]ntercept\u201d as \u201cthe aural acquisition of the contents of any wire, electronic or oral communication through the use of any electronic, mechanical or other device or of any sending or receiving equipment\u201d). The Court explained<\/a> that it has previously concluded that \u201cthe tape-recording of telephone conversations constitutes an intercept,\u201d and interpreted NRS 200.620 \u201cto prohibit the taping of telephone conversations with the consent of only one party.\u201d Lane v. Allstate Ins. Co.<\/a><\/em>, 114 Nev. 1176, 1179, 969 P.2d 938, 940 (1998); see also<\/em> Ira David, Note, Privacy Concerns Regarding the Monitoring of Instant Messaging in the Workplace: Is It Big Brother or Just Business?<\/a>, 5 Nev. L.J. 319, 330 (2004) (recognizing NRS 200.620 \u201cparallels the Wiretap Act, and is likewise restricted to interception of actual transmission\u201d.<\/p>\n

The crux of Ditech\u2019s argument was that NRS 200.620 does not apply because the allegedly prohibited conduct\u2014i.e., the interception\u2014 took place outside Nevada. Whereas Buckles argued that NRS 200.620 applied because the statute contains no location-based limitations and Ditech\u2019s conduct caused harm in Nevada. The Court agreed<\/a> with Ditech, and concluded that Mclellan v. State<\/a><\/em>, 124 Nev. 263, 182 P.3d 106 (2008), was instructive.<\/p>\n

The Court explained<\/a> that Mclellan<\/a><\/em> did not address whether someone could be found guilty of violating NRS 200.620 for recording a phone call outside of Nevada; rather, it addressed whether an out-of-state recording of a conversation with a person in Nevada made without that person\u2019s consent could be admitted as evidence at their criminal trial. The Court ultimately held \u201cthat Nevada law allows the admission of evidence legally obtained in the jurisdiction seizing the evidence.\u201d Id<\/a><\/em>. at 265, 182 P.3d at 108. To reach that holding, the Court concluded that the interception in Mclellan<\/em> \u201cwas lawful at its inception in California\u201d because California requires only one party to consent to police monitoring the communication. Id<\/a><\/em>. at 267 & n.7, 182 P.3d at 109 & n.7. While the central issue concerned admissibility, the Court concluded that because the recording was permissible in California, it was admissible in a Nevada criminal trial even though \u201cthe manner of interception would violate Nevada law had the interception taken place in Nevada.\u201d Id<\/a><\/em>. at 267, 182 P.3d at 109.<\/p>\n

Consistent with its analysis in Mclellan<\/a><\/em>, the Court held<\/a> that NRS 200.620<\/a> does not apply when the act of interception takes place outside Nevada. Instead, \u201c[i]nterceptions and recordings occur where made.\u201d Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police Dep’t<\/a><\/em>, 829 P.2d 1061, 1065 (Wash. 1992); see also State v. Fowler<\/a><\/em>, 139 P.3d 342, 347 (Wash. 2006) (\u201c[T]he test for whether a recording of a conversation or communication is lawful is determined under the laws of the place of the recording.\u201d). The Court further explained<\/a> that whether the interception of telephone conversations with Buckles and other putative class members was lawful is determined according to the laws of Arizona and Minnesota, the places where the conversations were intercepted and recorded, not according to the laws of Nevada where the calls were received. Therefore, the Court answered the certified question in the negative, concluding that NRS 200.620 does not apply to recordings of telephone conversations with a person in Nevada without that person\u2019s consent when the recordings are made by a party who is located and uses recording equipment outside of Nevada.<\/p>\n

Visit the Nevada Appellate Report<\/a> for more legal news.<\/h2>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ditech Financial, LLC vs. Buckles (Nev. Supreme Ct. \u2013 Sep. 14, 2017) NRS 200.620 prohibits a person from recording a telephone call unless both parties participating in the call consent to the recording. In response to a certified question submitted by the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, the Supreme Court of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[277,275,79],"class_list":["post-3497","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-search-and-seizure","tag-nrs-179-430","tag-nrs-200-620","tag-wiretap"],"yoast_head":"\nDoes Nevada law prohibit an out of state party from secretly recording their telephone conversation with someone in Nevada? - Nevada Appellate Report<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Does Nevada law prohibit an out of state party from secretly recording their telephone conversation with someone in Nevada? - Nevada Appellate Report\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Ditech Financial, LLC vs. Buckles (Nev. Supreme Ct. \u2013 Sep. 14, 2017) NRS 200.620 prohibits a person from recording a telephone call unless both parties participating in the call consent to the recording. In response to a certified question submitted by the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, the Supreme Court of […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Nevada Appellate Report\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jeffjaegerlaw\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jeffjaegerlaw\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-09-16T15:28:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-15T18:03:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/09\/Recording-Phone-Calls-1024x575.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jeff Jaeger\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@jeffjaegerlaw\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@jeffjaegerlaw\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jeff Jaeger\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Jeff Jaeger\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#\/schema\/person\/aaf883142d6b4d6c37b928912f475055\"},\"headline\":\"Does Nevada law prohibit an out of state party from secretly recording their telephone conversation with someone in Nevada?\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-09-16T15:28:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-15T18:03:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/\"},\"wordCount\":1088,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/09\/Recording-Phone-Calls-1024x575.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"NRS 179.430\",\"NRS 200.620\",\"Wiretap\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Search and Seizure\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/\",\"name\":\"Does Nevada law prohibit an out of state party from secretly recording their telephone conversation with someone in Nevada? - Nevada Appellate Report\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/09\/Recording-Phone-Calls-1024x575.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-09-16T15:28:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-15T18:03:22+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#\/schema\/person\/aaf883142d6b4d6c37b928912f475055\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/09\/Recording-Phone-Calls.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/09\/Recording-Phone-Calls.jpg\",\"width\":1050,\"height\":590},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Does Nevada law prohibit an out of state party from secretly recording their telephone conversation with someone in Nevada?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/\",\"name\":\"Nevada Appellate Report\",\"description\":\"Thoughts and commentary on recent Nevada appellate cases\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#\/schema\/person\/aaf883142d6b4d6c37b928912f475055\",\"name\":\"Jeff Jaeger\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a80c0f8748487218bdd8766770c52aea629e674e3e037731d61e0b14f2283567?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a80c0f8748487218bdd8766770c52aea629e674e3e037731d61e0b14f2283567?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jeff Jaeger\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jeffjaegerlaw\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/jeffjaegerlaw\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/author\/jeff-jaeger\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Does Nevada law prohibit an out of state party from secretly recording their telephone conversation with someone in Nevada? - Nevada Appellate Report","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Does Nevada law prohibit an out of state party from secretly recording their telephone conversation with someone in Nevada? - Nevada Appellate Report","og_description":"Ditech Financial, LLC vs. Buckles (Nev. Supreme Ct. \u2013 Sep. 14, 2017) NRS 200.620 prohibits a person from recording a telephone call unless both parties participating in the call consent to the recording. In response to a certified question submitted by the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, the Supreme Court of […]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/","og_site_name":"Nevada Appellate Report","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jeffjaegerlaw","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jeffjaegerlaw","article_published_time":"2017-09-16T15:28:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-15T18:03:22+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/09\/Recording-Phone-Calls-1024x575.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"Jeff Jaeger","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@jeffjaegerlaw","twitter_site":"@jeffjaegerlaw","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jeff Jaeger","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/"},"author":{"name":"Jeff Jaeger","@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#\/schema\/person\/aaf883142d6b4d6c37b928912f475055"},"headline":"Does Nevada law prohibit an out of state party from secretly recording their telephone conversation with someone in Nevada?","datePublished":"2017-09-16T15:28:45+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-15T18:03:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/"},"wordCount":1088,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/09\/Recording-Phone-Calls-1024x575.jpg","keywords":["NRS 179.430","NRS 200.620","Wiretap"],"articleSection":["Search and Seizure"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/","url":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/","name":"Does Nevada law prohibit an out of state party from secretly recording their telephone conversation with someone in Nevada? - Nevada Appellate Report","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/09\/Recording-Phone-Calls-1024x575.jpg","datePublished":"2017-09-16T15:28:45+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-15T18:03:22+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#\/schema\/person\/aaf883142d6b4d6c37b928912f475055"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/09\/Recording-Phone-Calls.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/09\/Recording-Phone-Calls.jpg","width":1050,"height":590},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2017\/09\/16\/does-nevada-law-prohibit-an-out-of-state-party-from-secretly-recording-their-telephone-conversation-with-someone-in-nevada\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Does Nevada law prohibit an out of state party from secretly recording their telephone conversation with someone in Nevada?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/","name":"Nevada Appellate Report","description":"Thoughts and commentary on recent Nevada appellate cases","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#\/schema\/person\/aaf883142d6b4d6c37b928912f475055","name":"Jeff Jaeger","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a80c0f8748487218bdd8766770c52aea629e674e3e037731d61e0b14f2283567?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a80c0f8748487218bdd8766770c52aea629e674e3e037731d61e0b14f2283567?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Jeff Jaeger"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jeffjaegerlaw","https:\/\/x.com\/jeffjaegerlaw"],"url":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/author\/jeff-jaeger\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3497","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3497"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3497\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3504,"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3497\/revisions\/3504"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3497"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3497"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3497"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}