{"id":3046,"date":"2015-06-24T08:11:55","date_gmt":"2015-06-24T15:11:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/?p=3046"},"modified":"2018-12-15T10:03:30","modified_gmt":"2018-12-15T18:03:30","slug":"must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/","title":{"rendered":"Must a court set forth specific findings to show that modifying a custodial agreement is in the best interest of the child?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bluestein v. Bluestein (Nev. Supreme Ct. \u2013 Mar. 26, 2015)<\/strong><\/p>\n

In this child custody case, the parties entered into an agreement for joint custody at the time of their divorce, and seven years later the mother requested that the district court modify the child custody designation to provide her with primary physical custody, so as to modify child support, in accordance with Rivero v. Rivero<\/em>, 125 Nev. 410, 216 P.3d 213 (2009). Rivero<\/em> established a formula to assist courts in determining when a joint physical custody arrangement exists by providing that if each parent had physical custody of the child at least 40 percent of the time, they shared joint physical custody.<\/p>\n

Here, the mother requested that the district court modify the joint custody designation to provide her with primary physical custody because the father did not have the child at least 40 percent of the time under the parties’ custodial agreement. The district court granted the mother’s request based on the amount of time the father had the child each week, but failed to consider whether the modification was in the child’s best interest. The father appealed challenging the designation of the mother as the child\u2019s primary physical custodian.<\/p>\n

The issue is whether a district court has authority to review and modify a timeshare arrangement if the party only requests a modification to a physical custody designation.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that the parties’ agreement to share joint physical custody controlled until the mother filed her motion requesting that the district court modify the custody agreement and designate her as the primary physical custodian. While the mother did not request a modification of the actual timeshare arrangement, by requesting a modification to the physical custody designation, the Court reasoned she was asking the district court to review the parties’ child custody agreement and apply current Nevada law. The Court concluded that once the mother filed her motion, the district court had authority to review the parties’ timeshare arrangement, determine whether the parties shared joint physical custody under Nevada law, and modify the agreement accordingly.<\/p>\n

Therefore, the Court held<\/a> that a district court has authority to review and modify a custodial agreement once a modification request is made by either party. The Court also held<\/a> that the child’s best interest must be the primary consideration for modifying custody and Rivero’s<\/em> 40-percent guideline shall serve as a tool in determining what custody arrangement is in the child’s best interest. Because the district court did not set forth specific findings that modifying the parties\u2019 custodial agreement was in the best interest of the child, the Court reversed and remanded for further proceedings.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bluestein v. Bluestein (Nev. Supreme Ct. \u2013 Mar. 26, 2015) In this child custody case, the parties entered into an agreement for joint custody at the time of their divorce, and seven years later the mother requested that the district court modify the child custody designation to provide her with primary physical custody, so as […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":3047,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3046","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-child-custody"],"yoast_head":"\nMust a court set forth specific findings to show that modifying a custodial agreement is in the best interest of the child? - Nevada Appellate Report<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Does a court have authority to review and modify a timeshare arrangement if the party only requests a modification to a physical custody designation.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Must a court set forth specific findings to show that modifying a custodial agreement is in the best interest of the child? - Nevada Appellate Report\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Does a court have authority to review and modify a timeshare arrangement if the party only requests a modification to a physical custody designation.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Nevada Appellate Report\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jeffjaegerlaw\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jeffjaegerlaw\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-06-24T15:11:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-15T18:03:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/06\/child-custody-e1435158628161.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"145\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jeff Jaeger\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@jeffjaegerlaw\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@jeffjaegerlaw\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jeff Jaeger\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Jeff Jaeger\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#\/schema\/person\/aaf883142d6b4d6c37b928912f475055\"},\"headline\":\"Must a court set forth specific findings to show that modifying a custodial agreement is in the best interest of the child?\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-06-24T15:11:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-15T18:03:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/\"},\"wordCount\":453,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/06\/child-custody-e1435158628161.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Child Custody\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/\",\"name\":\"Must a court set forth specific findings to show that modifying a custodial agreement is in the best interest of the child? - Nevada Appellate Report\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/06\/child-custody-e1435158628161.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-06-24T15:11:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-15T18:03:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#\/schema\/person\/aaf883142d6b4d6c37b928912f475055\"},\"description\":\"Does a court have authority to review and modify a timeshare arrangement if the party only requests a modification to a physical custody designation.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/06\/child-custody-e1435158628161.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/06\/child-custody-e1435158628161.jpg\",\"width\":200,\"height\":145,\"caption\":\"A childlike drawing illustrating divorce with the child be fought over in the middle.\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Must a court set forth specific findings to show that modifying a custodial agreement is in the best interest of the child?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/\",\"name\":\"Nevada Appellate Report\",\"description\":\"Thoughts and commentary on recent Nevada appellate cases\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#\/schema\/person\/aaf883142d6b4d6c37b928912f475055\",\"name\":\"Jeff Jaeger\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a80c0f8748487218bdd8766770c52aea629e674e3e037731d61e0b14f2283567?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a80c0f8748487218bdd8766770c52aea629e674e3e037731d61e0b14f2283567?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jeff Jaeger\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jeffjaegerlaw\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/jeffjaegerlaw\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/author\/jeff-jaeger\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Must a court set forth specific findings to show that modifying a custodial agreement is in the best interest of the child? - Nevada Appellate Report","description":"Does a court have authority to review and modify a timeshare arrangement if the party only requests a modification to a physical custody designation.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Must a court set forth specific findings to show that modifying a custodial agreement is in the best interest of the child? - Nevada Appellate Report","og_description":"Does a court have authority to review and modify a timeshare arrangement if the party only requests a modification to a physical custody designation.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/","og_site_name":"Nevada Appellate Report","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jeffjaegerlaw","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jeffjaegerlaw","article_published_time":"2015-06-24T15:11:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-15T18:03:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":200,"height":145,"url":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/06\/child-custody-e1435158628161.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Jeff Jaeger","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@jeffjaegerlaw","twitter_site":"@jeffjaegerlaw","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jeff Jaeger","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/"},"author":{"name":"Jeff Jaeger","@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#\/schema\/person\/aaf883142d6b4d6c37b928912f475055"},"headline":"Must a court set forth specific findings to show that modifying a custodial agreement is in the best interest of the child?","datePublished":"2015-06-24T15:11:55+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-15T18:03:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/"},"wordCount":453,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/06\/child-custody-e1435158628161.jpg","articleSection":["Child Custody"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/","url":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/","name":"Must a court set forth specific findings to show that modifying a custodial agreement is in the best interest of the child? - Nevada Appellate Report","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/06\/child-custody-e1435158628161.jpg","datePublished":"2015-06-24T15:11:55+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-15T18:03:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#\/schema\/person\/aaf883142d6b4d6c37b928912f475055"},"description":"Does a court have authority to review and modify a timeshare arrangement if the party only requests a modification to a physical custody designation.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/06\/child-custody-e1435158628161.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/06\/child-custody-e1435158628161.jpg","width":200,"height":145,"caption":"A childlike drawing illustrating divorce with the child be fought over in the middle."},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/2015\/06\/24\/must-a-court-set-forth-specific-findings-to-show-that-modifying-a-custodial-agreement-is-in-the-best-interest-of-the-child\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Must a court set forth specific findings to show that modifying a custodial agreement is in the best interest of the child?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/","name":"Nevada Appellate Report","description":"Thoughts and commentary on recent Nevada appellate cases","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#\/schema\/person\/aaf883142d6b4d6c37b928912f475055","name":"Jeff Jaeger","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a80c0f8748487218bdd8766770c52aea629e674e3e037731d61e0b14f2283567?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a80c0f8748487218bdd8766770c52aea629e674e3e037731d61e0b14f2283567?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Jeff Jaeger"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jeffjaegerlaw","https:\/\/x.com\/jeffjaegerlaw"],"url":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/author\/jeff-jaeger\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3046","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3046"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3046\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3050,"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3046\/revisions\/3050"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3047"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3046"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3046"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jeffjaeger.com\/nvapp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3046"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}